Uncategorized

Broken marriage culture


At the end of a meandering piece on single mothers in the Daily Beast, Amanda Marcotte writes:

There’s no reason to believe that simply putting a ring on it will make the real issues that women face—economic instability, lack of child care, lack of health care—any less pressing. Couples who are currently raising children together without being married, who register as “single mothers” in the data, aren’t going to suddenly get better jobs because they get married.

Actually, they are. Married men make more money than single men and divorced men. I can think of two big reasons why:

  1. Partnership with his wife allows specialization of tasks and increased efficiency. He spends less time shopping and cooking and more time at work.
  2. Responsibility is motivating. Nothing focuses a man’s creative energies like a wife and child depending on him to provide.

At any rate, who advocates simply “putting a ring on it”? There’s more to marriage than a ring and a certificate. It’s about trust and commitment.

Marcotte concludes:

All this focus on single motherhood distracts from the real issues that are creating problems for children, especially the children who live in the economic circumstances that produce more women labeled “single” regardless of their actual living situation on surveys. More than having a legally recognized husband the moment they give birth, women need health care, child care, equal pay, and a society that pays workers a decent wage instead of constantly shifting more wealth to the top 1 percent. If they have all these things, the rate of marriage at birth will probably go up as a result, but make no mistake, that too will be a symptom and not the cause of a more just society.

Classic utopianism. Improve the social safety net and everything will be hunky-dory. But in which one of these areas—healthcare, childcare, women’s wages, and wages in general—has there not been improvement in the last 50 years? None. The only decline we have seen in that time has been in marriage.

These stated “needs” are merely materialist expressions of angst at the state of our broken souls, of our broken marriage culture. A majority of us get by on incomes that fall short of what we imagine is necessary to lead comfortable lives. Yet we get by. How? Our greatest want, the desire for family, friendship, and community, isn’t satisfied by more take-home pay. It’s satisfied by the love and company of others, sharing whatever it is we have, whether prosperity or hardship.

If marriage provides a little more material security, that is a bonus. What it really does is ensure the consuming tasks of childrearing and child support don’t fall on the mother, burdened by her sex to be the presumed primary caregiver.

When Marcotte cites Jennifer Silva’s observation that nine of ten college-educated women wait until marriage to have children, as opposed to six of ten high school-educated women, she attributes the disparity to marriage being an institution biased towards the well-off. This flies in the face of high marriage rates across all classes in the past, as documented by Charles Murray in Coming Apart. All classes have seen a decline in marriage rates since the ’60s, but the middle and lower classes have suffered the largest declines.

If class was not determinative of marriage rates in the past, why is class determinative now? That is the question Silva and her acolytes like Marcotte don’t ask. If they did, they would discover the culprit is liberal policy prescriptions, which discourage marriage. Here are three examples how:

  1. The explosion of the entitlement state coincides with the implosion of the marriage rate. In 1960, Nicholas Eberstadt notes, less than a third of federal spending was on entitlements. Today, entitlements represent two-thirds of the budget. Why should a man or woman seek lifelong partnership in the other sex when the state stands ready to provide? Some men and women nobly reject the bargain, but it’s a tempting option good people are better off not having.
  2. Workplace regulations, environmental laws, Obamacare, and a host of other big government social engineering projects have priced many men out of the labor market and/or reduced hours and wages, crippling their ability to be the providers their nature compels them to be.
  3. The sexual constitution has been ripped apart by unfettered access to contraceptives and abortion. Women are less discriminating in their choice of sexual partners, deluded by the myth of consequence-free sex. Men, freed from women’s expectations, pursue their boyhood fantasies of immediate gratification well into adulthood, putting off marriage.

There is no “war on single mothers” in stating the obvious preference for children to be raised in a marriage of both their parents. That arrangement is better for men, better for women, and better for children. Single mothers make the most of a hard situation, and many of them are heroes. But let’s not pretend they want the same for their own daughters.

About these ads

About Joseph Dooley

I’m 28 years old and I’ve been writing since I learned how to type. I grew up in Texas but I lived nearly 5 years in the belly of the liberal beast, Maryland. Through my writing, I hope to convince readers of the truth and help to reverse the suicidal momentum of the present. As Francis Schaeffer wrote: “Any ways in which the system is still working is largely due to the sheer inertia of the continuation of the past principles. But this borrowing cannot go on forever.” Check out my blog, "Life's complexity and mortal weight."

Discussion

One thought on “Broken marriage culture

  1. Lefties talk about a “war on women.” The real war on women is in the devaluation of marriage, the institution in which a woman can choose to be a mother and where she can depend upon the father of her children to protect and provide for her and her children. It is the Left that would destroy the safe haven in which a woman is at liberty to choose the life that most fulfills her womanhood. Conservatives are pro-choice! Lefties are intolerant of real choice.

    Posted by Linus | August 23, 2013, 5:36 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by sword. The other is by debt." -John Adams 1826

PLEASE SHARE US ON FACEBOOK & TWITTER

Red Pill Report is a labor of love for the many contributors who post here. They share their thoughts and talents with us because, like you, they love this great Country and hope to contribute in some small way to returning America to the principles on which it was founded. How can you help? Please share our articles with friends and family. Share buttons for Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, and Email are found at the bottom of each article. Our writers also love your comments, so please share your thoughts with us, when you can. We appreciate our readers, and would love to have more! Thank you!

Archives

Topics

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34,773 other followers

%d bloggers like this: